GBN Blog

The Coming Bust in Clean Technology

New clean technologies are the great hope for dealing with the challenges that the world faces in so many arenas, whether it is climate change, pollution, water, waste management and more. As the world grows richer and more populous, the pressure on our natural systems will become ever more intense. The only lever we have to diminish human impact on that environment is new technology.

Fortunately, an enormous amount of money—literally, billions of dollars—has been pouring into new start-ups, championing the technologies needed to solve the problems of energy, climate change, water and food scarcity and pollution. Unfortunately, a lot of that money will be lost because it is not being spent very intelligently.

Why do I believe that? The way in which venture investors are currently are pursuing clean technology is not sustainable. The approach has an element of reality to it and an element of hype.

Why is this true?  Well, first of all, the time required for most of these new kinds of technology ventures to become profitable is usually much longer than the investment horizon of venture funds.  Most clean technologies require integration with heavily regulated infrastructure, whether it’s electricity grids, pollution control systems, water systems or city infrastructure. Changes in these kinds of systems go notoriously slow and new standards take a long time to be negotiated.  For example, changing standards on moving from copper pipe to plastic pipe, an important move to reduce the impact of real estate development on resource use took almost 30 years.

The typical timeframes to make clean technologies commercially successful are longer than the 7 to 10 year payout expected in venture funds. The latest successful large IPO – A123systems, an electrical storage device manufacturer – needed 8 years and significant amounts of corporate and government support to get to the finish line and this is one of the best cases.

A second major reason to be careful is that the technology is especially capital-intensive. Plants to build solar panels or wind turbines or are typically fairly expensive, north of tens to hundreds of millions of dollars.  The entrepreneurs, for example, who are today trying to reinvent the automotive industry are looking at capital costs in the hundreds of millions to build a car plant for electric vehicles.  The amounts exceed by far the funding capacity of the average venture fund, used to investments scaling up to a maximum of tens of millions of dollars as is common in the software industry. This drawback may be temporarily countered by the Department of Energy’s  $30bn loan guarantee program to support renewable energy projects and modernization of the grid.

As it is, hardware typically has slimmer margins than software. Now that the global recession squeezes margins even more, investors are put in a position where they have to invest a great deal for a long time and can still only expect relatively modest returns.

Another key issue is the fact that many of the investors are driven more by ideology than by a real deep knowledge of the industry.  What is going on is that many young investors with a fair amount of money see the hype and the urgency of the problem and decide to try an approach—which was not unusual in the venture industry—of let a thousand flowers bloom and hope that at least one or two of them will be the next giant.  That may succeed, but a lot of capital will be destroyed along the way.

One of the keys to the early success of the venture capital industry was that it was founded by men, mostly, who came out of the semiconductor industry and continued to invest in that same industry. As a result, they were quite competent to make the judgments about technology, about people, about timing and thus built a stellar track record of success.  Today, there are almost no energy,waste management, water or utility executives that have moved from those industries into venture capital.  Until more experienced talent strengthens the ranks of venture capital, many clean tech investments run the risk of being miss-directed or poorly executed.

These three reasons – the time frame, the scale of investment and the quality of the investors – all argue that there’s a high probability that sometime over the next few years, we will see many of these investments go bad. In some cases, we may even see  the funds behind them wilt, especially the funds set up at the early part of this decade, which means that they will be coming up again for cashing out sometime soon. As a result, we can expect to see a major downturn in investment in clean technology.

So, how do we improve the situation?  How do we increase the likelihood of the success of clean tech venture investments? We do need them to succeed. Well, one thing we can do is learn from other, similar situations.  The biotech industry went through a quite similar experience.  A great deal of enthusiasm at the beginning and then the realization that it takes a long time – sometimes a decade or more of trials –  before you can actually begin to see any revenue, let alone any profit from a new drug. A very long, uncertain, pay back period for what is often a very expensive front-end investment in research.

To overcome this problem, new investment vehicles were developed to enable biotech companies to bridge the valley of death that they were facing.  Some were late-stage investment funds, others were new kinds of vehicles for off-balance sheet investment to finance R&D, like limited partnerships or SWORDS – stock warrant off-balance sheet research and development securities.  CalPERS, with a number of venture funds like Alta Partners created late-stage funds to be able to pick up companies that were in the situation of having developed a drug, having it entered at trials, but not having enough resources to see it through the lengthy process to profitability.

A second important thing the clean tech investment sector can do is to attract talent from the sectors that they’re trying to enter, whether it is water, energy or waste management. These need to be experienced executives, entrepreneurial sorts, who see the opportunity and know the business well enough to help drive the investments to success.

And then finally, it is important to target arenas for investment that may be less capital-intensive, less regulatorily constrained and with technologies that can be adopted quickly into the infrastructure.  Probably the best examples are in the arenas of efficiency technologies, efficiencies in the use of energy, efficiencies in the use land or water.  These types of technologies often offer rather dramatic improvements and can be migrated into the demand side of the market without having to wrestle with the vested interests on the supply side of the equation.

So with those three things in mind—changing investment vehicles, attracting new talent and targeting less capital-intensive arenas—I think it may be possible to increase the likelihood of success in future investment and minimize the consequences of the coming bust in clean technology.

15 Responses to “The Coming Bust in Clean Technology”

  1. Ed Peterson says:

    Excellent post as usual, thanks for writing all this helpful stuff on a regular basis.

  2. One aspect is often neglected. Pandora’s Box from a spiritual view point. The entire Bible is about nothing else, considering the Fig Tree or tree of knowledge and its abuse for selfinterest, causing to fall short of wisdom. Basically two mental approaches to the Covenant, as distinguished by Paul in Galatians 4.21>. And its perfectly sticks with the works by Kuhn, Luhmann, Shannon.
    No democracy exists when its core framework in such sense as described by E. Fritz Schumacher, is not at root level geared to eliminate abuse of cognitive (dis)advantages or to protect against cognitive distans arising in organisation, for the sheer purpose of profit maximization.
    The world is not going forward but backward, until this core issue has become properly and thus fundamentally tackled. Yet the message of Pandora’s Box is rather: not for the opportunists. This concerns secret wisdoms, that if the wise happens to run into it, he/she won’t reveal. If it is to be found also by the opportunist pragmatists, it is not for the wise to do so, only to have prophecied: all answers are simple and do exist for eternal unlimited free unmetered power generation, the perfect democracy, the perfect model for education and teaching and the definition for the path required for harmonic society (“peace”) – yet not without the proper mental and spiritual mind set.
    The door could be opened to the world nearest to the perfect, but not for this mankind. It has not experienced enough as a whole yet, in terms of heavy sufferings, for the gap to be bridged in time for the problem solving total solutions, to be of any use. The abyss must be gone through before the difference with how all things could have been ideally will make sense. It would define (=require) a very different setup of institutions in society, this mankind will never imagine, until the ship has not been turned by the wall, but shipwrecked into the rocks before the coast.
    While there had been some at the “Magdalene” or fishing tower all the time, telling like prophets: just have belief in what we could teach, if only you had asked. We would have given the perpetuum mobile design with more thrust than anything combusting or any invention required for sustainable growth benefiting all equally. But all wanted to see first before believing, and still claim to deserve a better world.
    So hundreds of trillions in sustainable economic growth are lost to half branches that never reached to become a ripe fig or applied pure wisdom.
    That is the bitter pill – Rev. 10.11, espeially for such enlightened or bearers of secret knowledge.
    Or does Peter Schwartz show where the red carpet is laid out for what Kuhn considered beyond prevailing paradigms. Do car makers or education materials and education software companies offer a profitsharing joint venture to someone
    prior to that person first having shown how its done? The whole system is setup for the stimulation of abuse of cognitive disadvantage. But the boss of bosses the boss among man than faces is the order that lies between nothing and the first form of matter or energy. So makind will always stay following the wrong or false prophets. Who can not both relate to state-of-art science and biblical texts, to show the very same about the nature of knowledge and reality, knowth nothing where the long view begins.

  3. I start visiting your site and i must say that is written with knowledge. I like it.

  4. Your site appears truly outstanding. Being a blog author myself, I really appreciate the time you took in making this write-up.

  5. At all times good to see, this was obvious a superb post. In concept I wish to write like this too. You need time to creat that informative and as well as a number of effort to create an excellent article.

  6. Wendy Firman says:

    Considerably, the article is de facto the freshest on this worthy topic. I agree with your conclusions and definitely will thirstily stay up for your forthcoming updates. Saying thanks will definitely not merely be adequate, for the large lucidity in your writing. I can instantly grab your rss feed to remain privy of any type of updates. Pleasant work and much success in your business endeavors!

  7. Buying carts are quite essential to any E-Commerce site. You might have to have a user friendly searching cart with all essential attributes in order to convert your site traffics.

  8. Hello mate. I am still quite new in blog and the entire things around this field. There are various terms I still can’t know. I’m not even sure I can blogging half decent to yours. I am gonna browse the entire site maybe I can grasp your blogging style a little.

  9. Gold Party says:

    Medication Battles…

    [...]illegal weed is merely to be able to limit public liberties[...]…

  10. What’s Happening i’m new to this, I stumbled upon this I’ve found It positively useful and it has helped me out loads. I hope to contribute & aid other users like its helped me. Good job.

  11. I’m so happy to read this. This is the type of manual that needs to be given and not the accidental misinformation that’s at the other blogs. Appreciate your sharing this greatest doc.

  12. Useful info. Fortunate me I found your site by accident, and I am surprised why this accident did not came about in advance! I bookmarked it.

  13. I think this is one of the most vital info for me. And i am glad reading your article. But want to remark on few general things, The website style is ideal, the articles is really excellent : D. Good job, cheers

  14. I would like to thank you for the efforts you have put in writing this site. I am hoping the same high-grade site post from you in the upcoming as well. Actually your creative writing abilities has inspired me to get my own blog now. Actually the blogging is spreading its wings rapidly. Your write up is a good example of it. Goldstar Locksmith 9620 w russell rd #2134 las vegas NV 89148 United States 702-475-6827.

  15. Automotive tech is an interesting background. Automotive technology schools tend to be the greatest choice to get in this business. Cars will always be around thus there are jobs everywhere. I learned about automotive lifts, ppg automotive paint, automotive electrical supplies, and more in school. Now I am using it every day and I love what I do.

Leave a Reply