Scenario Planning

A Brief History

The idea of scenarios — telling possible stories about the future — is as old as humankind. Scenarios are a tool for ordering our perceptions about alternative future environments in which today's decisions might be played out. As a methodology, it has been used by the military, but only in the last 30 years, in the face of increasing uncertainty and complexity, have corporations and other large global organizations begun to develop sophisticated scenario planning processes. Royal Dutch/Shell pioneered this application in the 1970s when its planners realized that conventional forecasting could not capture the complex unpredictability of the oil industry. Shell made the tool famous by using it to great effect, with two examples being particularly noteworthy: once to anticipate the Arab oil embargo, and then again to anticipate and prepare for the dramatic drop in oil prices during the 1980s. In both cases, the use of scenarios forced leaders to examine their deeply held assumptions, and to practice what they would do if the unthinkable happened (which it did, both times).

Developing Scenarios

So what is scenario planning, as we practice it at GBN? The process is highly interactive and imaginative. It begins by isolating the decision to be made, or the issue to be explored. Sometimes, scenario projects are very specific, and ask questions such as, "Should we spend x dollars doing y thing?" Sometimes, projects are more general, such as those that probe the changing nature of national security (and therefore where the U.S. government ought to be putting its resources). Still others use scenarios to stress test the viability of current strategies or to generate innovation portfolios.

In every case, scenario planning involves rigorously challenging the mental maps that shape our perceptions, in part by tapping unorthodox and provocative sources. We all have blindspots and biases. Moreover, our perceptions are often shaped by our past successes and failures, which may no longer be relevant in a rapidly changing world. A good scenario-planning project expands leaders' peripheral vision and forces them to examine their assumptions.

Scenario projects start by making visible those assumptions, beliefs, and biases — which are often expressed as "the Official Future" — so they can be challenged. The next steps are more analytical: identifying the driving forces (social, economic, political, and technological); the predetermined elements (i.e., what is inevitable, like many demographic factors that are already in the pipeline); and the critical uncertainties (i.e., what is unpredictable or a matter of choice, such as public opinion or customer behavior). These factors are then prioritized according to importance and uncertainty, with the most critical uncertainties framing the scenario space.

These exercises culminate in two to four carefully constructed scenarios. In practice, scenarios resemble a set of stories, written or spoken, built around carefully constructed logics. Only a few scenarios, ideally three or four, can be fully developed and remembered; each should represent a plausible alternative future, not a random set of possibilities of a best case, worst case and "most likely" continuum. As a result, scenarios defy denial by encouraging — in fact, requiring — the willing suspension of disbelief. Scenarios also reduce paralysis by organizing and structuring the key choices an executive faces. The test of a good scenario is not whether it portrays the future accurately but whether it enables an organization to learn, act, and adapt.

Using Scenarios

Once the scenarios have been fleshed out and woven into a narrative, the team identifies the implications for the focal question and the options for action first within each scenario — and then across the set, looking for robust strategies that will work, regardless which future unfolds. Then the team lists leading indicators to be monitored on an ongoing basis — the events to watch for which will indicate which future (or combination of futures) is actually unfolding. By rehearsing the future in this way, scenarios enable an organization to adapt more quickly to what is actually happening, and to anticipate better what could happen. In the face of some major new development, the organization doesn't have to spend months in denial, and then more months developing options. Scenarios are also helpful tools for generating new ideas, and testing their efficacy. New proposals can be flown through the scenarios, using them as a sort of wind tunnel to test their resilience. And scenarios can be integrated with a wide range of other tools and processes for strategy development, innovation, risk management, visioning, and executive learning..

Hence, organizations can avoid wishful thinking — blindly pursuing their own visions, without the discipline of a thoughtful strategy that might actually turn that vision into a reality. Decisions, which have been pre-tested against a range of what fate may offer, are more likely to stand the test of time. And taking an informed long view may give an organization the courage to stick to a set of priorities, rather than backing off in the face of resistance or failure.

Scenario planning is intellectually rich and challenging. But it's not a dry academic exercise. It's a conversation, involving human beings who want to learn together. Therefore, it's a complex process of group dynamics that must be managed carefully if it is to succeed. When it does, a group of people creates something together — an analysis, a vision, a language for describing the world, a plan of action — that makes them more committed and able to work together effectively.

Ultimately, scenario planning is an ongoing process of organizational learning; the scenarios are a platform for continuously re-perceiving the changing business environment and preparing for the new risks and exciting opportunities that will emerge.

Related Articles

By GBN and The Rockefeller Foundation
Four scenarios on the future of technology and international development illuminate the tremendous opportunities (and challenges) that lie ahead, especially in emerging countries, as government, philanthropy, and business use technology to eradicate poverty and increase future options, prosperity and well being for billions.
By Constance Gustke, The Conference Board
The history, process, value, and application of scenario planning in a variety of industries is explored.
By Nils Gilman, Peter Schwartz, Doug Randall
This GBN white paper offers an alternative analytic approach to understanding climate change disruptions, and a new way to both anticipate and imagine potential impacts of climate change.
By Nick Turner
In times of great uncertainty, scenario planning can help executives develop more adaptive, robust strategies.
By Diana Scearce, Katherine Fulton
GBN's scenario guide encourages nonprofit leaders to challenge the status quo, or get better at doing so, by asking "What if?"
By Chris Ertel and Maryln Walton
Herman Miller, the noted workplace design company, has used scenario planning to explore the future of work and to engage its customers in an ongoing conversation about the implications. In this interview published in SEE magazine, Chris Ertel, GBN, and Maryln Walton, Herman Miller, discuss their work together and the value of thinking scenarically.
By Erik Smith, Peter Schwartz
Twenty senior U.S. executives, in cooperation with the Environmental Protection, assess the possible strategic impacts of energy across a range of future scenarios.
By Jonathan Star, Doug Randall
Technology case studies show how scenarios can help address paralysis and denial, twin obstacles that prevent successful companies from adopting new growth strategies.
By Peter Schwartz
Visionary perspectives on the future, culminating in an optimistic scenario. Commissioned by the SCI FI Channel, with a foreward by Arnold Schwarzenegger.
By The Arctic Council/GBN
Four scenarios, developed with the Arctic Council’s Protection of the Arctic Marine Environment group, contemplate the wide-ranging effects that continued climate change could have on Arctic waterways in the future.
By Andrew Blau
This GBN report examines the dramatic changes that the field of independent media is experiencing and how the reverberations will be felt across every organization that uses media to communicate, connect, and create.
By Peter Schwartz and Nancy Murphy
Despite the uncertainties surrounding climate change, businesses can and must act now; this summary from a June GBN/Monitor Group workshop suggests how to make climate change a competitive and adaptive advantage.
By Peter Schwartz, Doug Randall
Executives can anticipate, prepare for, and act on strategic surprises by using scenario thinking and related tools.
By Chris Ertel and Doug Randall
Got risk? Try scenario thinking. In this Financial Times article, Chris Ertel and Doug Randall, lay out the reasons why scenario thinking is an effective approach for managing risk.
By Eamonn Kelly and Steven Weber
For a special Financial Times series on "mastering risk," GBN tackles the common perception that risk is something to be avoided and minimized.
By Jay Ogilvy and Erik Smith
How different is scenario planning done for public versus private purposes? The authors distill a set of lessons based on regional scenario planning projects run by GBN throughout the 1990s.
By Erik Smith and Lynn Carruthers
Report of a GBN meeting on how today’s emerging cultural changes may shape the global business environment of the future
By Eamonn Kelly and Nancy Murphy
Report of a GBN meeting on whether China will be a global rule maker or rule taker in the decade ahead, and how either—or both—roles might unfold?
By Pharma Futures., UK
A multi-stakeholder scenario planning project on the long-term value outlook of the global pharmaceutical industry
By Peter Schwartz
Peter Schwartz argues that the developments underway in physics, biology, chemistry, and other disciplines signal a new scientific revolution.
By Lawrence Wilkinson
A GBN CLASSIC. GBN’s 1995 Scenario Book examines the very nature of change itself and the implications for business and society.
By Adam Kahane
A pre-eminent scenarist reflects on what entrepreneurs and activists have in common.
By Peter Schwartz and Doug Randall
A “worse case” scenario examining the possible impact of significant climate change on U.S. national security.
By Tadashi Nakamae and GBN
These scenarios for Japan, and the underlying research, were developed to catalyze a conversation on the country’s future.
By Peter Schwartz and Jay Ogilvy
“Plotting Your Scenarios” by two GBN cofounders is an invaluable introduction to the art and process of scenario planning.
By Diana Scearce and Katherine Fulton
A discussion of how scenario thinking can best be adapted for small resource-constrained organizations working for the public interest.
By COSE and GBN
This set of scenarios, developed by GBN and Ohio's Council of Smaller Enterprises, examines the future of U.S. healthcare from the perspective of small businesses five or 10 years from now,
By Adam Kahane
The pioneering multi-stakeholder scenario process that helped bring down apartheid in South Africa.
By Arthur Muliro, Aidan Eyakuze, and Barbara Heinzen
GBN in Conversation with Arthur Muliro, Aidan Eyakuze, and Barbara Heinzen, scenarists with the Society for International Development, on "Disaster or Model for the Future? The Perils and Potentials of East Africa"
By Jay Ogilvy
One of GBN’s first (and still relevant) public scenario projects: three scenarios for the future of higher education in California, developed with the National Education Association.
Pages: 1 2